Filters
We believe that the Commission’s draft in its current form would create an unlevel playing field between recycling technologies, keep consumers from taking sustainable purchasing decisions due to structural greenwashing and therefore contradict the objective of the SUPD to promote the transition to a circular economy.
The EU elections will largely determine what guides EU politics and laws for the next five years. Even though plastic is driving some of the dominating issues of this election, there is a great danger that it will be pushed off the agenda – that’s rubbish! We need decisionmakers who will strive to reduce plastic production, support reuse, eliminate toxic chemicals, and deliver real solutions to the plastic pollution crisis to protect us and future generations.
Plastic proliferation and pollution fuel the triple planetary crisis: climate change, biodiversity loss and pollution. They impact us all, but not equally; thus they exacerbate injustice.
Treating plastic waste is an energy-intensive process, creating 193 Mt CO2e (carbon dioxide equivalent) tonnes of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions per year. That’s more than the annual emissions of two […]
Plastic production, use and disposal fuels climate change and pollution, but it also drives biodiversity loss, on land and at sea, with a variety of ecosystems and species declining.
The production and consumption of plastics is a driver for natural resource depletion as it uses
extracted resources as a raw material, and mostly fossil feedstock.
Where the EU decides to allocate public investments can either fuel the plastic crisis and perpetuate the problem or contribute to solving it.
Plastic pollution is not limited to the visible pollution from macroplastics such as packaging or fishing gear. There is also an invisible pollution associated with plastic
From the beginning, fossil fuel and petrochemical companies behind plastic production emit toxins that harm human health.